Countries › Brazil › Guide › 14. Disputes › Consumer claims and class actions in Brazil: strict liability, abusive clauses, small claims courts and collective actions
Consumer claims and class actions in Brazil: strict liability, abusive clauses, small claims courts and collective actions
Last verified: 2026-10-27 · Status: Stable
Consumer law is the biggest source of litigation for companies selling to Brazilians: manufacturers, importers and service providers, Brazilian or foreign, are strictly liable for defects, the judge may reverse the burden of proof, consumers may sue at home, and clauses that impose arbitration or limit access to courts are void. Individual claims up to 40 minimum wages (R$64,840 in 2026) go to small claims courts with no first instance costs, where a company that fails to appear is presumed to accept the facts alleged. Collective actions can be brought by prosecutors, public defenders, governments and associations at least 1 year old, without advancing costs; a successful judgment on homogeneous individual rights benefits all victims, who then liquidate their own damages.
USD figures use the Banco Central do Brasil PTAX selling rate of R$5.3346 per US dollar for 27 October 2026. The real moved sharply in late October (R$5.0377 on 23 October and R$5.5007 on 26 October), so conversions are for orientation only.
Key facts
| Strict liability of manufacturers and importers, Brazilian or foreign, for product defects | Yes CDC art. 12, as of 1990-09-11 · in force |
|---|---|
| Consumer right to withdraw from off premises and online purchases | 7 daysCDC art. 49; Decreto nº 7.962/2013 art. 5, as of 2013-03-15 · in force |
| Small claims court ceiling in 2026 (40 minimum wages) | 64840 BRLLei nº 9.099/1995 art. 3 I; Decreto nº 12.797/2025, as of 2026-01-01 · in force |
| Lawyer required in small claims courts | Only above 20 minimum wages (R$32,420 in 2026) and on appeal Lei nº 9.099/1995 arts. 9 and 41 § 2, as of 2026-01-01 · in force |
| Limitation for consumer damage claims from defective products or services | 5 yearsCDC art. 27, as of 1990-09-11 · in force |
| Minimum age of an association to bring a collective action | 1 yearsCDC art. 82 IV; Lei nº 7.347/1985 art. 5 V, as of 1990-09-11 · in force |
| Compulsory arbitration clauses in consumer contracts | Void CDC art. 51 VII, as of 1990-09-11 · in force |
The rule
Example: In 2026: small claims ceiling R$64,840; no lawyer needed up to R$32,420. / About US$12,155 and US$6,077.Lei nº 9.099 of 26 September 1995 (Special Courts Law), Arts. 3 item I and § 3, 8 § 1, 9 caput and § 4, 20, 41, 42, 54 and 55, 1995-09-26 official text · verified 2026-10-27
| Forum | Who can sue | Value | Key feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small claims court (JEC) | Individuals, micro and small firms | Up to 40 minimum wages, R$64,840 (US$12,155) | No first instance costs; absent defendant presumed to accept facts (Lei nº 9.099 arts. 20 and 54) |
| Ordinary state court | Any consumer | Any | Consumer may sue at home; burden of proof may be reversed (CDC arts. 6 VIII and 101 I) |
| Collective action (CDC or public civil action) | Prosecutors, defenders, governments, associations 1 year old | Any | No advance costs; success benefits all victims (CDC arts. 87 and 103) |
Where consumer claims go (2026 values at R$1,621 minimum wage).
Worked example
- A foreign electronics brand sells online to Brazilian consumers through a local importer. A defective charger causes damage: the consumer can sue the foreign manufacturer and the importer, regardless of fault, at the consumer's own domicile (CDC arts. 12 and 101 I), and has 5 years from learning of the damage (art. 27). A clause in the online terms requiring arbitration in another country is void (art. 51 VII).
- A consumer claims R$15,000 (about US$2,812) in a small claims court without a lawyer. The importer must send a representative with power to settle; if nobody appears, the consumer's facts are taken as true (Lei nº 9.099 arts. 9 § 4 and 20).
Step by step
- 1. Review consumer terms for void clauses: liability caps, compulsory arbitration, unilateral changes and court access limits (CDC art. 51).
- 2. Set up a process to handle withdrawals within 7 days for online and off premises sales (art. 49) and to fix defects within 30 days (art. 18).
- 3. Appoint and train prepostos with written power to settle for small claims hearings across states (Lei nº 9.099 art. 9 § 4).
- 4. Track collective actions against your sector; their outcome can bind you towards all affected consumers (CDC art. 103).
- 5. Keep product documentation and warnings in Portuguese to reduce information defect claims (arts. 12 and 14).
Common traps
- Missing a small claims hearing, which means the consumer's facts are presumed true (Lei nº 9.099 art. 20).
- Relying on foreign law, foreign forum or arbitration clauses against Brazilian consumers (CDC arts. 51 VII and XVII, 101 I).
- Assuming the group is shielded: group companies are subsidiarily liable and the entity can be disregarded (CDC art. 28).
- Treating business customers as outside the CDC: liability caps toward a legal entity consumer are allowed only in justified cases (art. 51 I).
Sources
- Lei nº 8.078 of 11 September 1990 (Consumer Defence Code), Planalto compiled text
- Decreto nº 7.962 of 15 March 2013 (e-commerce), Planalto
- Lei nº 9.099 of 26 September 1995 (Special Courts Law), Planalto
- Lei nº 7.347 of 24 July 1985 (Public Civil Action Law), Planalto
- Decreto nº 12.797 of 23 December 2025 (2026 minimum wage), Planalto
- Banco Central do Brasil PTAX exchange rates
Related pages
- disputes/commercial-litigation
- disputes/limitation-periods
- regulation/business-regulation-essentials
- normal-abroad/what-works-differently-in-brazil
- trade/courier-and-ecommerce-imports
- /country/brazil/
- /calendar/
- Live dashboard
Related: Brazil country profile · live dashboard · central bank and release calendar · our posts on X
