Countries › Paraguay › Guide › 14. Disputes › Cross border service, evidence and documents in Paraguay: Hague conventions, Mercosur letters rogatory and the apostille
Cross border service, evidence and documents in Paraguay: Hague conventions, Mercosur letters rogatory and the apostille
Last verified: 2026-10-28 · Status: Stable
Paraguay joined the Hague Service Convention (in force 1 January 2024) and the Hague Evidence Convention (in force 22 August 2023), with declarations requiring Spanish and objecting to service by postal and other alternative channels. Within Mercosur, Bolivia and Chile, letters rogatory for service and evidence travel through central authorities without legalization under the agreement approved by Ley 3036/2006. Paraguay has applied the Apostille Convention since 30 August 2014, and outside treaties incoming letters rogatory must be legalized by a Paraguayan consul.
USD figures use PYG 5,868.31 per US dollar, the Banco Central del Paraguay reference quotation published for Wednesday 28 October 2026. Conversions are for orientation only.
Key facts
| Party to the Hague Service Convention | Yes, in force 1 January 2024 HCCH status table, accession 23 June 2023, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
|---|---|
| Objects to postal and alternative service (art. 10) | Yes Paraguay declaration 23 June 2023, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| Language required for service | Spanish or official Spanish translation Paraguay declaration art. 5 and 7, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| Party to the Hague Evidence Convention | Yes, in force 22 August 2023 HCCH status table, accession 23 June 2023, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| Apostille Convention in force for Paraguay | 2014-08-30 dateHCCH status table, accession 10 December 2013, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| Security for costs barred for Mercosur, Bolivia and Chile parties | Yes Ley 3036/2006 agreement art. 4, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| BCP reference rate used for conversions | 5868.31 PYG per USDBCP planilla 28 October 2026, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
The rule
Cost to do it: Official Spanish translation of all documents served; no fee figure is published in the HCCH status table.
Example: A US plaintiff serving a claim on a company in Asunción sends the request to the Paraguayan Central Authority with a Spanish translation; mailing the complaint by courier is not valid service under Paraguay's art. 10 objection. / For a US$1,000,000 (PYG 5,868,310,000) claim, defective service is also a ground to refuse exequatur later (CPC art. 532 c).Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 on Service Abroad (HCCH status table and Paraguay declarations), Art. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10; Paraguay accession 23 June 2023, 2024-01-01 official text · verified 2026-10-28
Cost to do it: Translation and counsel; the declarations should be read before drafting a request, especially on pre trial document discovery (art. 23).
Example: A Brazilian arbitration seeking the testimony of a witness in Asunción can instead use the tribunal's power to ask a Paraguayan judge for assistance, decided within 7 days (Ley 7561/2025 art. 40). / In a US$1,000,000 US court case, a broad document request to a Paraguayan bank should be checked against Paraguay's art. 23 declaration first.Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad (HCCH status table), Paraguay accession 23 June 2023; declarations under art. 4, 8, 23 and 33, 2023-08-22 official text · verified 2026-10-28
Cost to do it: Free execution of letters rogatory except special evidence or professionals (art. 15); no foreign plaintiff security (art. 4).
Example: A Brazilian company suing in Asunción cannot be asked for a cautio judicatum solvi because it is foreign (art. 4). / Serving a US$500,000 (PYG 2,934,155,000) claim on a Bolivian distributor goes through the two central authorities, with no apostille needed.Ley Nº 3036/2006, approves the Mercosur, Bolivia and Chile jurisdictional cooperation agreement, Agreement art. 2 to 17, 2006-10-26 official text · verified 2026-10-28
Cost to do it: Apostille fee in the issuing country; consular legalization fees where no treaty applies.
Example: A Delaware certificate of incumbency for a shareholder resolution needs only a US apostille and a Spanish translation to be used in Paraguay. / For a US$1,000,000 claim against a defendant in a non treaty country, the Paraguayan judge fixes a longer appearance period and sends a letter rogatory (art. 143).Hague Apostille Convention (HCCH status table); Ley Nº 1337/1988, Código Procesal Civil, CPC art. 129 and 143, 2014-08-30 official text · verified 2026-10-28
| Sending state | Instrument | Channel | Language |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hague Service Convention state | Hague Service Convention (Paraguay since 1 Jan 2024) | Paraguayan Central Authority; no postal or direct service (art. 10 objection) | Spanish or official translation |
| Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Bolivia, Chile | Ley 3036/2006 agreement; Las Leñas Protocol as amended (Ley 3451/2008) | Central authorities, diplomatic channel, or party (party route needs legalization) | Requesting language plus translation |
| Any other state | Código Procesal Civil art. 129 | Letter rogatory legalized by a Paraguayan consul | Spanish translation |
Which channel to use for service in Paraguay
Worked example
- A German supplier sues a Paraguayan buyer in Hamburg for US$1,000,000 (PYG 5,868,310,000). It must serve through the German central authority to the Paraguayan Central Authority with a Spanish translation, because Paraguay objects to postal service. If it later needs to enforce the German judgment in Paraguay, proof of that proper service supports exequatur under CPC art. 532 c).
Step by step
- Identify the instrument: Hague Service, the Mercosur agreement or the CPC fallback.
- Translate all documents into Spanish by an official or registered translator.
- Send through the Central Authority; do not rely on courier or email service on Paraguayan defendants.
- Keep the certificate of service: it is your proof for later recognition.
- For evidence, consider whether an arbitral tribunal can use court assistance under Ley 7561/2025 art. 40 instead of a Hague letter of request.
Common traps
- Service by mail or by a private process server on a defendant in Paraguay is not valid under Paraguay's art. 10 objection.
- Untranslated documents can be refused (Paraguay's art. 5 declaration).
- Letters rogatory sent by the party under the Mercosur agreement must be legalized, unlike those sent through central authorities (art. 10).
Sources
- HCCH status table, Service Convention
- HCCH declarations, Service Convention (Paraguay)
- HCCH status table, Evidence Convention
- HCCH status table, Apostille Convention
- Ley 3036/2006, Mercosur, Bolivia and Chile jurisdictional cooperation agreement (BACN)
- Ley 3451/2008, amendment to the Las Leñas Protocol (BACN)
- Ley 1337/1988, Código Procesal Civil (BACN)
- Banco Central del Paraguay, reference exchange rates
Related pages
- disputes/foreign-judgments
- disputes/commercial-litigation
- disputes/commercial-arbitration
- entities/incorporation-checklist
- https://theargentinethread.com/guide/
- /country/paraguay/
- /calendar/
- Live dashboard
Related: Paraguay country profile · live dashboard · central bank and release calendar · our posts on X
Get rule changes weekly
Free. One email a week from The LatAm Thread.
One more step after you press the button: we take you to Substack, where your email is already filled in. Confirm there to start. No spam, unsubscribe anytime, we never share your address. By subscribing you agree to the privacy policy.
