Countries › Peru › Guide › 14. Disputes › Limitation periods in Peru: civil prescription and caducidad, tax and labour periods, and the short statutory deadlines that kill claims
Limitation periods in Peru: civil prescription and caducidad, tax and labour periods, and the short statutory deadlines that kill claims
Last verified: 2026-10-28 · Status: Stable
Under the Civil Code, contract and other personal actions prescribe in ten years and tort claims in two, unless a special law says otherwise; only the law can set these periods and nobody can waive prescription in advance. Prescription can be suspended or interrupted (for example by acknowledgment, a formal demand or service of a claim), but caducidad periods run without interruption, can be applied by the judge on its own and extinguish the right itself. Special regimes are much shorter: four years for labour claims after employment ends, four to ten years for tax assessments, three months to challenge administrative acts, 30 business days for procurement arbitration and 20 business days to annul an award.
USD figures use S/ 3.452 per US dollar, the banking system selling rate published by the Superintendencia de Banca, Seguros y AFP for 27 October 2026, from the Banco Central de Reserva del Perú statistics series PD04640PD. UIT amounts use the 2026 UIT of S/ 5,500 set by Decreto Supremo Nº 301-2025-EF, as cited in SUNAT Resolución de Superintendencia Nº 000016-2026/SUNAT. Conversions are for orientation only.
Key facts
| General limitation period for personal actions | 10 yearsCódigo Civil art. 2001.1, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
|---|---|
| Limitation period for tort damages | 2 yearsCódigo Civil art. 2001.4 (Ley Nº 30179), as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| Limitation period for non employment service fees | 3 yearsCódigo Civil art. 2001.3, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| Advance waiver of prescription allowed | No textCódigo Civil art. 1990, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| Court applies prescription on its own motion | No (caducidad yes) textCódigo Civil art. 1992 and 2006, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| Tax assessment limitation period | 4 years (6 if no return; 10 for unpaid withholding) textCódigo Tributario art. 43, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| Limitation period to request a tax refund | 4 yearsCódigo Tributario art. 43, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| Limitation period for labour claims | 4 years from the end of employment textLey Nº 27321, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| Caducidad to challenge an administrative act | 3 monthsTUO Ley Nº 27584 art. 18, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| Unidad Impositiva Tributaria 2026 | 5,500 PENDS Nº 301-2025-EF, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
| SBS banking system selling rate, 27 October 2026 | 3.452 PEN per USDBCRP series PD04640PD, as of 2026-10-28 · in force |
The rule
Cost to do it: No cost; it is a defence that must be raised, never applied by the court on its own.
Example: A clause in a Lima supply contract extending the limitation period to 20 years is void, because only the law sets prescription periods. / A debtor sued on a US$50,000 claim after the period has run must raise prescription; the judge will not apply it by itself.Código Civil, Decreto Legislativo Nº 295 (Libro VIII), MINJUS official edition of August 2014, Art. 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993 and 2000, 1984-07-25 official text · verified 2026-10-28
Cost to do it: No cost; missing the period loses the action.
Example: An unpaid invoice of S/ 100,000 (US$28,969) under a supply contract falling due in November 2026 can be claimed until November 2036, unless a special law sets a shorter period. / A consultant's US$20,000 fee claim under a services contract (not employment) prescribes in three years.Código Civil, Decreto Legislativo Nº 295 (Libro VIII), MINJUS official edition of August 2014, as amended by Ley Nº 30179 (El Peruano, 6 April 2014), Art. 2001 and 2002, 2014-04-06 official text · verified 2026-10-28 · changed: Ley Nº 30179 (6 April 2014) moved alimony from the two year to a new fifteen year period; the ten year and two year rules for business claims did not change.
Cost to do it: A notarial letter putting the debtor in default is a cheap way to interrupt prescription; the notary charges its own fee.
Example: A Lima creditor whose claim is nine years old sends a formal demand by notarial letter; prescription is interrupted and a new ten year period starts. / A foreign creditor that files a conciliation request on a US$80,000 claim suspends prescription until the conciliation ends.Código Civil, Decreto Legislativo Nº 295 (Libro VIII), MINJUS official edition of August 2014; Ley Nº 26872, Ley de Conciliación, art. 19 as amended by Decreto Legislativo Nº 1070, CC art. 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998; Ley Nº 26872 art. 19, 1984-07-25 official text · verified 2026-10-28
Cost to do it: No cost; but unlike prescription, a demand letter does not stop a caducidad period.
Example: Sending a letter does not stop the three month caducidad period to challenge an administrative act; only filing the claim does. / A contractor with a US$2 million procurement claim cannot negotiate past the 30 business day caducidad period to start arbitration.Código Civil, Decreto Legislativo Nº 295 (Libro VIII), MINJUS official edition of August 2014, Art. 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, 1984-07-25 official text · verified 2026-10-28
Cost to do it: No cost; keep records for at least the six year period where filing is in doubt.
Example: Income tax for 2026, whose annual return is due in 2027, can be assessed until 31 December 2031 if the return is filed. / A Peruvian subsidiary that overpaid US$100,000 of tax has four years to request a refund.Texto Único Ordenado del Código Tributario, art. 43 as replaced by Decreto Legislativo Nº 953 (El Peruano, 5 February 2004), Art. 43 and 44, 2004-02-05 official text · verified 2026-10-28
Cost to do it: No cost; former employees can claim unpaid benefits for four years after leaving.
Example: A worker dismissed on 30 November 2026 can sue for unpaid benefits until 30 November 2030. / Severance or overtime claims worth US$15,000 from an employee who left in 2026 remain live until 2030.Ley Nº 27321, Ley que establece nuevo plazo de prescripción de las acciones derivadas de la relación laboral (dated 21 July 2000), as compiled in the MTPE compendium of labour rules, Sole article, 2000-07-22 official text · verified 2026-10-28
Cost to do it: No cost; diary these deadlines from the day of notice.
Example: A company notified of an award on 2 November 2026 has 20 business days to seek annulment. / A supplier whose US$300,000 procurement contract is terminated has 30 business days from notice to start arbitration.Decreto Legislativo Nº 1071 (28 June 2008); TUO de la Ley Nº 27584 (DS Nº 011-2019-JUS, 4 May 2019); Ley Nº 32069 (24 June 2024); Ley Nº 29571 (2 September 2010), DL 1071 art. 64.1; TUO Ley 27584 art. 18; Ley 32069 art. 80.1, 84.4, 84.5 and 84.8; Ley 29571 art. 121, 2024-06-24 official text · verified 2026-10-28
| Claim | Period | Type | Norm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contract and other personal actions; real actions; enforcing a judgment; nullity of a legal act | 10 years | Prescription | Código Civil art. 2001.1 |
| Damages from a simulated act | 7 years | Prescription | Código Civil art. 2001.2 |
| Fees for services outside employment | 3 years | Prescription | Código Civil art. 2001.3 |
| Tort damages; voidability; revocatory action | 2 years | Prescription | Código Civil art. 2001.4 |
| Labour claims | 4 years after employment ends | Prescription | Ley Nº 27321 |
| Tax assessment and collection | 4, 6 or 10 years | Prescription | Código Tributario art. 43 |
| Tax refund or set off | 4 years | Prescription | Código Tributario art. 43 |
| Challenge of an administrative act | 3 months | Caducidad | TUO Ley Nº 27584 art. 18 |
| Procurement arbitration | 30 business days | Caducidad | Ley Nº 32069 art. 84 |
| Annulment of an arbitral award | 20 business days | Statutory deadline | DL Nº 1071 art. 64.1 |
| Consumer Code infraction | 2 years | Prescription (administrative) | Ley Nº 29571 art. 121 |
Key limitation and caducidad periods in Peru
Worked example
- A Peruvian subsidiary of a US group is owed S/ 345,200 (US$100,000) by a Lima customer under a supply contract that fell due on 15 January 2020. The ten year period for personal actions runs until January 2030. In 2026 the customer acknowledges the debt in writing, which interrupts prescription and starts a new ten year period. If the subsidiary files a conciliation request first, prescription is also suspended while the conciliation runs.
- The same subsidiary is notified on 2 November 2026 of a municipal resolution it wants to challenge. That is a caducidad period of three months: letters to the municipality do not stop it, and only filing the contentious administrative claim in time preserves the right.
Step by step
- Classify each claim: contract, tort, labour, tax, administrative or procurement, and check for a special law.
- Identify whether the period is prescription (can be interrupted) or caducidad (cannot).
- Interrupt prescription when needed with a written acknowledgment from the debtor, a notarial demand or service of a claim, or suspend it by filing for conciliation.
- For caducidad deadlines, diary the last day and file the claim or arbitration itself; negotiations do not stop the clock.
- Raise prescription expressly as a defence when sued, because the judge will not apply it on its own.
Common traps
- Contract clauses that shorten or lengthen statutory prescription are void, because only the law can set prescription periods (art. 2000).
- Caducidad runs even on non business days and through negotiations; only the cases in art. 1994.8 suspend it.
- A claim served before an incompetent court still interrupts prescription, but withdrawal or abandonment of the case cancels the interruption (art. 1996.3 and 1997).
- A party that causes the end of a conciliation by not attending loses the suspension of prescription (Ley Nº 26872 art. 15).
- Tax periods are six years when no return was filed, so dormant entities that never filed remain exposed longer.
Sources
- Código Civil, MINJUS official edition August 2014 (gob.pe)
- Texto Único Ordenado del Código Tributario, SUNAT full text
- MTPE Compendio de normas laborales (Ley Nº 27321), gob.pe
- Ley Nº 26872, Ley de Conciliación, MINJUS SPIJ text (gob.pe)
- Decreto Legislativo Nº 1071, El Peruano 28 June 2008 (Congress archive scan)
- Decreto Supremo Nº 011-2019-JUS, TUO of Ley Nº 27584 (Congress archive copy of the gazette)
- Ley Nº 32069, Ley General de Contrataciones Públicas (Congress consolidated text)
- Código de Protección y Defensa del Consumidor, Ley Nº 29571 (gob.pe)
- SUNAT Resolución Nº 000016-2026/SUNAT citing the 2026 UIT
- BCRP statistics, SBS selling exchange rate series PD04640PD
Related pages
- disputes/courts-arbitration-and-enforcement
- disputes/claims-against-the-state
- disputes/mediation-and-conciliation
- taxes/tax-audits-and-disputes
- labor/labor-inspections-fines-and-claims
- /country/peru/
- /calendar/
- Live dashboard
Related: Peru country profile · live dashboard · central bank and release calendar · our posts on X
Get rule changes weekly
Free. One email a week from The LatAm Thread.
One more step after you press the button: we take you to Substack, where your email is already filled in. Confirm there to start. No spam, unsubscribe anytime, we never share your address. By subscribing you agree to the privacy policy.
