Countries › Dominican Republic › Guide › 14. Disputes › Investment arbitration and the Dominican Republic: DR-CAFTA, treaties and no ICSID Convention
Investment arbitration and the Dominican Republic: DR-CAFTA, treaties and no ICSID Convention
Last verified: 2026-10-30 · Status: Stable
The Dominican Republic signed ICSID in 2000 and has not ratified it, so ICSID Convention arbitration is closed. DR-CAFTA claimants use the ICSID Additional Facility or UNCITRAL rules, after 90 days notice and within three years. UNCTAD lists eleven bilateral treaties in force, including Spain, France, Italy and the Netherlands. The 2001 treaty with Argentina was signed but is not in force.
Key facts
| ICSID party | No, signatory only yes/noICSID Convention, as of 2026-10-30 · in force |
|---|---|
| ICSID signature | 2000-03-20 dateICSID Convention, as of 2026-10-30 · in force |
| DR-CAFTA limitation | 3 yearsDR-CAFTA art. 10.18.1, as of 2026-10-30 · in force |
| DR-CAFTA notice of intent | 90 daysDR-CAFTA art. 10.16.2, as of 2026-10-30 · in force |
| Bilateral treaties listed in force | 11 treatiesUNCTAD table, labeled secondary to treaty texts, as of 2026-10-30 · in force |
| Treaty with Argentina | Signed 2001, not in force textUNCTAD table, as of 2026-10-30 · in force |
The rule
| Partner | Signed | In force |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 16 Mar 1995 | 7 Oct 1996 |
| France | 14 Jan 1999 | 23 Jan 2003 |
| Taiwan Province of China | 5 Nov 1999 | 27 Nov 2001 |
| Chile | 28 Nov 2000 | 8 May 2002 |
| Finland | 27 Nov 2001 | 21 Apr 2007 |
| Morocco | 23 May 2002 | 4 Jan 2007 |
| Panama | 6 Feb 2003 | 17 Sep 2006 |
| Switzerland | 27 Aug 2004 | 30 May 2006 |
| Netherlands | 30 Mar 2006 | 1 Oct 2007 |
| Italy | 12 Jun 2006 | 25 Nov 2009 |
| Korea | 30 Jun 2006 | 10 Jun 2008 |
Bilateral treaties UNCTAD lists in force, seen through its database via search on 30 October 2026
Worked example
- A US investor learns of a license refusal on 1 March 2025. Six months must pass, 90 days notice is due, and the claim must be filed no later than the three year mark, about 1 March 2028. Filing local suits on the same measure can block the claim because of the waiver.
Step by step
- Map the investor's nationality and structure before a dispute.
- Date the first knowledge of breach and loss.
- Serve notice of intent.
- Choose Additional Facility or UNCITRAL.
- Plan local action around the waiver.
Common traps
- An Additional Facility award is not an ICSID Convention award, so enforcement relies on the New York Convention or local rules of the seat, not ICSID art. 54.
- Corona shows the clock is enforced: the claim failed on the three year limit, so date the first knowledge of breach and loss with care.
- Argentine investors have no treaty route under the 2001 text.
- UNCTAD data was read through search results because its site blocked direct reading, so check the treaty text before relying on a date.
Sources
- ICSID list of contracting and signatory states, 17 July 2026
- DR-CAFTA Chapter Ten, USTR
- UNCTAD Investment Policy Hub, Dominican Republic
- Ley 489-08, Ministerio de Trabajo copy
- Constitución de 2024, Gaceta 11170, Banco Central copy
- ICSID case ARB(AF)/22/1
- ICSID case ARB(AF)/14/3
Related pages
- disputes/enforcing-arbitral-awards
- disputes/claims-against-the-state
- trade/dr-cafta
- https://theargentinethread.com/guide/
- /country/dominican-republic/
- /calendar/
- Live dashboard
Related: Dominican Republic country profile · live dashboard · central bank and release calendar · our posts on X
Get rule changes weekly
Free. One email a week from The LatAm Thread.
One more step after you press the button: we take you to Substack, where your email is already filled in. Confirm there to start. No spam, unsubscribe anytime, we never share your address. By subscribing you agree to the privacy policy.
