Countries › Colombia › Guide › 14. Disputes › Investment treaty arbitration and ICSID in Colombia: treaties in force, ICSID membership and how the State defends claims

Investment treaty arbitration and ICSID in Colombia: treaties in force, ICSID membership and how the State defends claims

Argentina. For full detail on Argentina, go to The Argentine Thread.

Last verified: 2026-10-26 · Status: Changing

Colombia has been an ICSID contracting state since 14 August 1997, and the ICSID list of contracting states dated 16 August 2026 still shows it with no denunciation recorded; a denunciation would take effect six months after notice and would not affect consent given before. The trade ministry lists investment protection in force under bilateral treaties (including Spain, Switzerland, Peru, China, India, the United Kingdom, Japan, France and, from 30 March 2026, Venezuela) and in free trade agreement chapters (including Mexico, Chile, Canada, the United States, EFTA, Israel, Korea, Costa Rica and the Pacific Alliance). The Agencia Nacional de Defensa Jurídica del Estado coordinates the State's defence and amicable settlement; ICSID awards are enforced in Colombia as final judgments.

No currency conversions on this page.

Key facts

ICSID contracting state	yes yes or noLey 267 de 1996, as of 2026-10-26 · in force
ICSID Convention in force for Colombia	1997-08-14 dateLey 267 de 1996, as of 2026-10-26 · in force
ICSID denunciation takes effect after	6 monthsICSID Convention art. 71, as of 2026-10-26 · in force
Colombia and Venezuela investment agreement in force	2026-03-30 dateLey 2370 de 2024, as of 2026-10-26 · in force
US trade promotion agreement with investment chapter in force	2012-05 monthLey 1143 de 2007, as of 2026-10-26 · in force

The rule

1. Colombia signed the ICSID Convention on 18 May 1993, deposited ratification on 15 July 1997 and became a contracting state on 14 August 1997. Congress approved it by Ley 267 de 1996. The ICSID list as of 16 August 2026 shows Colombia as a contracting state with no denunciation note (unlike states such as Ecuador, whose 2009 denunciation is noted).Ley 267 de 1996 (Diario Oficial 42.704 of 30 January 1996); ICSID/3 list of contracting states, ICSID list, Colombia entry, 1996-01-29 official text · verified 2026-10-26

2. ICSID jurisdiction covers legal disputes arising directly out of an investment between a contracting state and a national of another contracting state that both consent to in writing. Once given, consent cannot be withdrawn unilaterally. Awards are binding with no appeal other than the Convention's remedies, and every contracting state must enforce their pecuniary obligations as a final judgment of its own courts.ICSID Convention (approved by Ley 267 de 1996), Art. 25, 53 and 54, 1996-01-29 official text · verified 2026-10-26

3. A contracting state may denounce the Convention by written notice; denunciation takes effect six months after the depositary receives it and does not affect rights and obligations arising from consent to ICSID jurisdiction given before the notice was received.ICSID Convention, Art. 71 and 72, 1965-03-18 official text · verified 2026-10-26

4. The trade ministry lists as international investment agreements in force: bilateral agreements with Spain (2005 agreement, in force September 2007), Switzerland (October 2009), Peru (December 2010), China (July 2012), India (July 2012), the United Kingdom (October 2014), Japan (September 2015), France (14 October 2020) and Venezuela (signed 3 February 2023, approved by Ley 2370 de 2024 and Sentencia C-338 de 2025, in force 30 March 2026); and investment chapters of trade agreements with Mexico (1995, amended 2011), Chile (May 2009), Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras (2009 to 2010), Canada (August 2011), EFTA (Switzerland and Liechtenstein July 2011, Norway September 2014, Iceland October 2014), the United States (May 2012), Israel (11 August 2020), Korea, Costa Rica and the Pacific Alliance, with the European Union agreement also listed. Signed but not in force: the United Arab Emirates (2017), a new Spain agreement (16 September 2021), Singapore (2013), Turkey (2014), Brazil and Panama.Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo, Acuerdos Internacionales de Inversión, Ministry list of agreements in force and signed, 2026-10-26 official text · verified 2026-10-26 · changed: Colombia and Venezuela investment agreement in force from 30 March 2026.

5. The Agencia Nacional de Defensa Jurídica del Estado assumes and coordinates the defence of Colombia in international investment disputes with the support of the trade ministry, and acts as facilitator of amicable settlements and sole spokesperson towards the investor. The earlier inter agency regime in Decreto 1074 de 2015 (from Decreto 1939 de 2013) was repealed by Decreto 1696 de 2019.Decreto 4085 de 2011 as amended by Decreto 1698 de 2019 art. 1 (Diario Oficial 51.079 of 17 September 2019); Decreto 1074 de 2015 Part 2 Title 3 Chapter 2 (repealed), Decreto 4085 art. 6; Decreto 1074 art. 2.2.3.2.1.1 note, 2019-09-17 official text · verified 2026-10-26

6. Within Colombia, the Agencia Nacional de Defensa Jurídica del Estado may intervene in any domestic proceeding where a public entity is party or the State's assets are at stake, and act as the entity's lawyer.Ley 1564 de 2012, Art. 610, 2012-07-12 official text · verified 2026-10-26

Instrument	Type	In force (as listed)
Spain	Bilateral (2005 agreement)	September 2007; new 2021 agreement signed, pending
Switzerland	Bilateral	October 2009
Peru	Bilateral	December 2010
China	Bilateral	July 2012
India	Bilateral	July 2012
United Kingdom	Bilateral	October 2014
Japan	Bilateral	September 2015
France	Bilateral	14 October 2020
Venezuela	Bilateral	30 March 2026
Mexico	Trade agreement chapter	1995
Chile	Trade agreement chapter	May 2009
Canada	Trade agreement chapter	August 2011
United States	Trade agreement chapter 10	May 2012
EFTA	Trade agreement chapter 5	July 2011 to October 2014 by state
Israel	Trade agreement chapter 10	11 August 2020
Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras	Trade agreement chapter 12	November 2009 to March 2010

Investment protection instruments listed by the trade ministry (tlc.gov.co, consulted 26 October 2026)

Worked example

A US investor whose concession is cancelled may consider a claim under chapter 10 of the US trade promotion agreement, after any notice and waiting periods in that chapter.
If the tribunal awards damages, Colombia must comply; an ICSID award is enforceable in Colombia as a final judgment without review, while a non ICSID treaty award would go through recognition under Ley 1563.
The Agencia Nacional de Defensa Jurídica del Estado leads Colombia's side, including any amicable settlement talks.

Step by step

Map your ownership chain to see which treaty nationality you can rely on, before a dispute arises.
Read the specific treaty: notice of intent, cooling off periods, waivers of local remedies and time limits differ.
Send notice to the State (the Agency coordinates the defence) and explore amicable settlement.
File under ICSID or the treaty's alternative rules, and track any change in Colombia's ICSID status on the ICSID list.

Common traps

Treaty protection depends on the investor's nationality and the investment definition in each treaty; restructuring after a dispute is foreseeable may not qualify.
Signed treaties not yet in force (for example the 2021 Spain agreement, Singapore, Turkey, the UAE) give no protection yet.
A future ICSID denunciation would take effect six months after notice; consent already given survives under art. 72, but treaty specific consent rules matter.
No Colombia and Argentina investment agreement appears on the ministry's list, although both countries are ICSID contracting states.

Sources

← Enforcing foreign court judgments in Colombia: exequatur before the Supreme Court, reciprocity and the Montevideo ConventionClaims against the Colombian State: administrative courts, short filing deadlines, mandatory conciliation and payment of judgments →