Countries › Uruguay › Guide › 13. Regulation › Personal data protection in Uruguay
Personal data protection in Uruguay
Last verified: 2026-10-27 · Status: Stable
Ley 18.331 protects personal data of individuals and companies, requires prior informed consent unless an exception applies, and obliges private controllers to register their databases with the URCDP within 90 days of starting activity. Foreign businesses that offer goods or services to people in Uruguay or analyse their behaviour are covered, must apply privacy by design and impact assessments for risky processing, and must notify breaches to the URCDP within 72 hours. Uruguay holds an EU adequacy decision, so data can flow in from the EU; transfers out to countries without adequate protection need consent, a listed exception or URCDP authorization, with fines up to UI 500,000 (about US$83,000).
USD figures use UYU 40.210 per US dollar, the BCU quotation for DLS. USA BILLETE on 27 October 2026; amounts in Unidades Indexadas (UI) use UYU 6.6792 per UI, the BCU quotation for 27 October 2026, both retrieved from the BCU quotations service on 27 October 2026. Amounts in Unidades Reajustables (UR) use UYU 1,940.77 per UR, the value fixed by Decreto 229/026 (IMPO lists it as the latest UR, in force for September 2026). Conversions are rounded and for orientation only.
Key facts
| Prior express consent required as main legal basis | Yes, with statutory exceptions Ley 18.331 art. 9, as of 2026-10-27 · in force |
|---|---|
| Deadline to answer a data access request | 5 business daysLey 18.331 art. 14, as of 2026-10-27 · in force |
| Deadline to rectify, update or delete data | 5 business daysLey 18.331 art. 15, as of 2026-10-27 · in force |
| Deadline to register a new private database | 90 days from start of activityDecreto 414/009 art. 17, as of 2026-10-27 · in force |
| Deadline to notify the data protection officer | 90 days from start of processingDecreto 64/020 art. 14, as of 2026-10-27 · in force |
| Deadline to start breach mitigation | 24 hoursDecreto 64/020 art. 3, as of 2026-10-27 · in force |
| Data protection impact assessment required for high risk processing | Yes Decreto 64/020 art. 6, as of 2026-10-27 · in force |
| EU adequacy decision | Yes, Implementing Decision 2012/484/EU Decision 2012/484/EU, as of 2026-10-27 · in force |
| Data of companies protected | Yes Ley 18.331 art. 4 D, as of 2026-10-27 · in force |
| Maximum retention by processor after contract, with authorization | 2 yearsLey 18.331 art. 30, as of 2026-10-27 · in force |
The rule
Cost to do it: No fee; internal cost of a data inventory and retention schedule.
Example: A Montevideo B2B supplier's database of client companies and their contact persons is personal data under art. 4 D, not just the individuals. / A US SaaS provider processing Uruguayan corporate customers' data must apply the same principles even though the customers are companies.Ley Nº 18.331 (Personal Data Protection and Habeas Data), art. 4, 5 and 8, 2008-08-11 official text · verified 2026-10-27
Cost to do it: No fee; a foreign controller using Uruguayan equipment beyond transit needs a local representative.
Example: A Uruguayan subsidiary running a customer loyalty programme is covered as an established controller. / A US app that targets Uruguayan users with local pricing and tracks their behaviour is covered with no Uruguayan entity.Ley Nº 19.670, art. 37, art. 37, 2018-10-15 official text · verified 2026-10-27
Cost to do it: No fee; cost of privacy notices and consent records.
Example: A gym that collects members' health data needs express written consent under art. 18. / A US marketing platform cannot rely on implied consent buried in terms of use; consent must be express and prominent.Ley Nº 18.331, art. 9, 13 and 18, 2008-08-11 official text · verified 2026-10-27
Cost to do it: Internal process cost; litigation cost if a habeas data action is filed.
Example: A request received on Monday 2 November 2026 must be answered by Monday 9 November 2026. / A US lender scoring Uruguayan applicants automatically must be ready to explain the criteria if a decision is challenged under art. 16.Ley Nº 18.331, art. 14, 15, 16, 37 and 38, 2008-08-11 official text · verified 2026-10-27
Cost to do it: Ley 18.331 and Decreto 414/009 set no registration fee; cost is preparing the registration form for each database.
Example: A new Uruguayan subsidiary that starts operating on 1 December 2026 must register its HR and customer databases by 1 March 2027. / A US group's Uruguayan branch should register each database and display the URCDP resolution number on its website or premises.Ley Nº 18.331, art. 28 as reworded by Ley Nº 18.719 art. 152, and art. 29; Decreto Nº 414/009 art. 15, 16, 17, 19 and 20, Ley 18.331 art. 28 and 29; Decreto 414/009 art. 15 to 20, 2009-08-31 official text · verified 2026-10-27
Cost to do it: Cost of preparing and documenting the assessment, usually by the data protection officer or external counsel.
Example: A Uruguayan health app must complete an impact assessment before launch because sensitive data are its main business. / A US adtech firm profiling Uruguayan users should document an impact assessment before processing starts.Ley Nº 18.331, art. 12 as reworded by Ley Nº 19.670 art. 39; Decreto Nº 64/020 art. 5 to 9, Ley 18.331 art. 12; Decreto 64/020 art. 5 to 9, 2020-02-17 official text · verified 2026-10-27
Cost to do it: Cost of an internal or external officer; entities with similar activities may share one (Decreto 64/020 art. 15).
Example: A Uruguayan retailer with 40,000 loyalty members exceeds the 35,000 threshold and must appoint and notify an officer. / If a US cloud provider used by a Uruguayan subsidiary is breached on a Friday, the URCDP must be notified by the following Monday.Ley Nº 19.670 art. 38 and 40; Decreto Nº 64/020 art. 3, 4, 10, 12, 13 and 14, Ley 19.670 art. 38 and 40; Decreto 64/020 art. 3 to 14, 2020-02-17 official text · verified 2026-10-27
Cost to do it: No fee set; cost of contractual clauses and, where needed, a URCDP authorization request.
Example: A Uruguayan call centre sending customer data to a parent in a country without adequacy needs consent, a contract based exception or URCDP authorization. / An EU company can send employee data to its Uruguayan service centre under the EU adequacy decision without extra transfer tools.Ley Nº 18.331, art. 23; Decreto Nº 414/009 art. 34 and 35; Commission Implementing Decision 2012/484/EU of 21 August 2012, art. 1, Ley 18.331 art. 23; Decreto 414/009 art. 34 and 35, 2012-08-21 official text · verified 2026-10-27
Cost to do it: Maximum fine UI 500,000 (about UYU 3,339,600, US$83,054) per sanction, plus suspension or closure.
Example: A processor that reuses a client's customer list for its own marketing breaches art. 30 and risks a fine up to UYU 3,339,600. / For a US company the fine ceiling is about US$83,054, but closure of a key database is the bigger operational risk.Ley Nº 18.331, art. 30 and 35, art. 30 and 35, 2008-08-11 official text · verified 2026-10-27
| Obligation | Deadline | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Answer access request | 5 business days | Ley 18.331 art. 14 |
| Rectify or delete | 5 business days | Ley 18.331 art. 15 |
| Register new database | 90 days from start of activity | Decreto 414/009 art. 17 |
| Report changes to registration | Quarterly | Decreto 414/009 art. 20 |
| Start breach mitigation | 24 hours | Decreto 64/020 art. 3 |
| Notify breach to URCDP | 72 hours | Decreto 64/020 art. 4 |
| Notify data protection officer | 90 days from start of processing | Decreto 64/020 art. 14 |
Key deadlines
| Sanction | Approx. UYU | Approx. USD |
|---|---|---|
| Observation or warning | ||
| Fine up to UI 500,000 | 3,339,600 | 83,054 |
| Suspension of database | 5 days | |
| Closure of database | Through the courts |
Sanctions (UYU and USD at the rates in the FX note)
Worked example
- Market entry checklist: a foreign fintech launching in Uruguay on 1 December 2026 with 50,000 expected users must register its databases by 1 March 2027 (Decreto 414/009 art. 17), appoint a data protection officer and notify the URCDP by the same date (Decreto 64/020 art. 10 and 14), and run an impact assessment before launch if it profiles users for credit (Decreto 64/020 art. 6).
- Fine exposure: the maximum fine of UI 500,000 equals about UYU 3,339,600 or US$83,054; because it is set in UI, the peso amount rises with inflation (Ley 18.331 art. 35).
- Transfers: a Uruguayan subsidiary sending payroll data to a group HR platform hosted in a country without adequacy can rely on the employees' unequivocal consent or on URCDP authorization based on contractual clauses (Ley 18.331 art. 23; Decreto 414/009 art. 35).
Step by step
- Map every personal database, including company and supplier data, and its legal basis.
- Register each database with the URCDP within 90 days of starting activity and display the resolution number.
- Update privacy notices to cover all art. 13 items, including international transfers.
- Run impact assessments before high risk processing and document privacy by design and by default.
- Appoint and notify a data protection officer if you process sensitive data as a main business or data of more than 35,000 people.
- Set up a breach plan: mitigation within 24 hours, URCDP notice within 72 hours, and notice to affected people.
- Document international transfers: adequacy, consent, contract necessity or URCDP authorization.
Common traps
- Uruguay protects data of legal persons, not only individuals, unlike many other regimes.
- Database registration is a standing obligation, and changes must be reported quarterly.
- Access and rectification deadlines are five business days, much shorter than the one month common elsewhere.
- Foreign companies targeting Uruguayan residents are covered even without a local entity.
- Processors must destroy data at the end of the contract unless expressly authorized to keep them, for at most two years.
- Sensitive data require express written consent; checkbox consent buried in terms will not do.
Sources
- IMPO, Ley Nº 18.331 (consolidated)
- IMPO, Ley Nº 19.670 art. 37
- IMPO, Ley Nº 19.670 art. 38
- IMPO, Ley Nº 19.670 art. 40
- IMPO, Decreto Nº 414/009 (regulation)
- IMPO, Decreto Nº 64/020 (accountability, breaches, officer)
- European Commission, adequacy decisions (Implementing Decision 2012/484/EU on Uruguay)
- BCU, exchange rate and UI quotations
Related pages
- regulation/regulatory-compliance-essentials
- regulation/electronic-documents-and-signatures
- regulation/consumer-protection
- sectors/software-and-it-services
- finance/financial-consumer-protection-and-credit-reporting
- labor/hiring-and-employment-contracts
- /country/uruguay/
- /calendar/
- Live dashboard
Related: Uruguay country profile · live dashboard · central bank and release calendar · our posts on X
